Decifrando a Moda Sustentável: Engajamento e Percepção de Valor como Impulsionadores da Intenção de Compra
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Consumo Sustentável
Engajamento
Percepção de Valor
Fast Fashion
Branding Sustentável.

Como Citar

Stocker, F., & Richter, R. R. (2026). Decifrando a Moda Sustentável: Engajamento e Percepção de Valor como Impulsionadores da Intenção de Compra. Retail Management Review, 6(RMR), e74. https://doi.org/10.53946/rmrreview.v6iRMR.74

Resumo

Objetivo do Trabalho: Analisar como o engajamento sustentável do consumidor influencia o comportamento de consumo sustentável no setor da moda, considerando o papel mediador da percepção de valor e o efeito moderador da comunicação institucional e do reconhecimento social das marcas.

Metodologia: Pesquisa quantitativa de natureza descritiva, baseada em survey online aplicada a 780 consumidores brasileiros. Os dados foram analisados por meio de Modelagem de Equações Estruturais (SEM), com validação dos construtos via Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (CFA) e testes de mediação e moderação por bootstrap.

Originalidade: O estudo propõe e valida um modelo integrativo que articula engajamento sustentável, percepção de valor e comunicação institucional em um único arcabouço empírico, avançando a literatura ao explicar o gap entre intenção e comportamento no consumo sustentável de moda.

Principais Resultados: Os resultados indicam que o engajamento sustentável exerce efeito direto positivo sobre o consumo sustentável, com mediação parcial da percepção de valor. Campanhas e mídias sociais, bem como a conscientização sobre a marca, moderam positivamente essa relação, enquanto a confiança genérica em campanhas não apresentou efeito significativo.

Contribuições Teóricas: A pesquisa contribui para o campo do comportamento do consumidor sustentável ao integrar fatores psicológicos, valorativos e comunicacionais, oferecendo evidências empíricas em contexto brasileiro e ampliando modelos tradicionalmente fragmentados.

https://doi.org/10.53946/rmrreview.v6iRMR.74
PDF (English)

Referências

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142

Bergamaschi, O. B. N., Ferraz, S. B., & Arantes, R. M. (2022). 'Young, wild, and green'? Uma análise da influência do afeto ambiental na intenção de compra de produtos verdes por jovens. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v21i1.18966

Candan, B., Uzunboylu, H., & Tat, M. (2022). Sustainable consumption behaviors of young consumers: A study from the perspective of consumer engagement. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 15(2), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1120463

Chen, Y. S., & Lee, C. Y. (2015). The impacts of green claims on coffee consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18(5), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2015.1093450

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110

Dias, G. S., Lima, R. B., & Gomes, J. L. (2024). Green under-communication: A study of underreported sustainability practices in fashion branding. Sustainability in Marketing, 9(1), 33–48.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gong, X., Wen, Y., Jiang, C., & Yu, Q. (2023). How does sustainable marketing affect customer engagement and green purchase intention? Evidence from the electric vehicle market. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1128686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128686

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Javed, S., Hussain, S., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Green branding in fast fashion: The role of brand credibility and green brand image on Chinese consumers. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.11.003

Johnstone, M. L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3

Kumar, V., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2021). Exploring the relationships between corporate social responsibility (CSR), trust, corporate reputation and brand equity. Sustainability, 13(6), 3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063210

Kumagai, S. (2023). Exploring the role of brand–sustainability congruence and self-brand connection in driving sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2031

Kumagai, S. (2024). Assessing brand-sustainability self-congruence: An identity-based model for sustainable brand evaluation. Journal of Brand Management, 31(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00276-4

Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18

Mathew, M., & Spinelli, R. (2025). Decoding sustainable drivers: A systematic literature review on sustainability-induced consumer behaviour in the fast fashion industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.005

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2

Papista, E., & Krystallis, A. (2013). Investigating the types of value and cost of green brands: Proposition of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1374-4

Prothero, A., McDonagh, P., & Dobscha, S. (2011). Is green the new black? Reflections on a green commodity discourse. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146710390306

Ray, S., & Nayak, R. (2023). Marketing sustainable fashion through consumer narratives and lifestyle branding. Fashion and Textiles, 10(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-023-00333-y

Silva, C. G., & Cé, L. F. (2025). The effects of greenwashing on purchasing intentions: An experimental study in Latin America. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 4(1), 1–15.

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2020). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 84(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919889612

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means–end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Fabricio Stocker, Rodrigo Ronda Richter

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.