Decoding Sustainable Fashion: Engagement and Perceived Value as Drivers of Purchase Intention
PDF

Keywords

Sustainable Consumption
Engagement;
Perceived Value
Sustainable Branding
Fast Fashion

How to Cite

Stocker, F., & Richter, R. R. (2026). Decoding Sustainable Fashion: Engagement and Perceived Value as Drivers of Purchase Intention. Retail Management Review, 6(RMR), e74. https://doi.org/10.53946/rmrreview.v6iRMR.74

Abstract

Objective: To analyze how consumer sustainable engagement influences sustainable consumption behavior in the fashion industry, considering the mediating role of perceived value and the moderating effect of institutional communication and brands’ social recognition.

Methodology: A quantitative, descriptive study based on an online survey conducted with 780 Brazilian consumers. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), with construct validation through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) besides mediation and moderation tests performed using bootstrap procedures.

Originality: The study proposes and validates an integrative model that articulates sustainable engagement, perceived value, and institutional communication within a single empirical framework, advancing the literature by explaining the gap between intention and behavior in sustainable fashion consumption.

Main results: The findings indicate that sustainable engagement has a positive direct effect on sustainable consumption, with partial mediation by perceived value. Sustainability campaigns and social media, as well as brand awareness, positively moderate this relationship, whereas general trust in campaigns did not present a significant effect.

Theoretical Contributions: This research contributes to the field of sustainable consumer behavior by integrating psychological, value-based, and communicational factors, providing empirical evidence in a Brazilian context and expanding traditionally fragmented theoretical models.

https://doi.org/10.53946/rmrreview.v6iRMR.74
PDF

References

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142

Bergamaschi, O. B. N., Ferraz, S. B., & Arantes, R. M. (2022). 'Young, wild, and green'? Uma análise da influência do afeto ambiental na intenção de compra de produtos verdes por jovens. Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5585/remark.v21i1.18966

Candan, B., Uzunboylu, H., & Tat, M. (2022). Sustainable consumption behaviors of young consumers: A study from the perspective of consumer engagement. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 15(2), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1120463

Chen, Y. S., & Lee, C. Y. (2015). The impacts of green claims on coffee consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 18(5), 430–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2015.1093450

Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110

Dias, G. S., Lima, R. B., & Gomes, J. L. (2024). Green under-communication: A study of underreported sustainability practices in fashion branding. Sustainability in Marketing, 9(1), 33–48.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gong, X., Wen, Y., Jiang, C., & Yu, Q. (2023). How does sustainable marketing affect customer engagement and green purchase intention? Evidence from the electric vehicle market. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1128686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128686

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Javed, S., Hussain, S., & Ahmed, S. (2024). Green branding in fast fashion: The role of brand credibility and green brand image on Chinese consumers. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 39, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.11.003

Johnstone, M. L., & Tan, L. P. (2015). Exploring the gap between consumers’ green rhetoric and purchasing behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2316-3

Kumar, V., Rahman, Z., & Kazmi, A. A. (2021). Exploring the relationships between corporate social responsibility (CSR), trust, corporate reputation and brand equity. Sustainability, 13(6), 3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063210

Kumagai, S. (2023). Exploring the role of brand–sustainability congruence and self-brand connection in driving sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2031

Kumagai, S. (2024). Assessing brand-sustainability self-congruence: An identity-based model for sustainable brand evaluation. Journal of Brand Management, 31(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00276-4

Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18

Mathew, M., & Spinelli, R. (2025). Decoding sustainable drivers: A systematic literature review on sustainability-induced consumer behaviour in the fast fashion industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.12.005

Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2

Papista, E., & Krystallis, A. (2013). Investigating the types of value and cost of green brands: Proposition of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1374-4

Prothero, A., McDonagh, P., & Dobscha, S. (2011). Is green the new black? Reflections on a green commodity discourse. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146710390306

Ray, S., & Nayak, R. (2023). Marketing sustainable fashion through consumer narratives and lifestyle branding. Fashion and Textiles, 10(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-023-00333-y

Silva, C. G., & Cé, L. F. (2025). The effects of greenwashing on purchasing intentions: An experimental study in Latin America. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 4(1), 1–15.

Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/208924

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2020). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 84(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919889612

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means–end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Fabricio Stocker, Rodrigo Ronda Richter

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.