How customer satisfaction influences the frequency of purchases and experimentation on other sales channels in a retailer in brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53946/rmr.v4i1.34Keywords:
NPS, Purchase frequency, Customer loyalty, Sales channels, Multi-channel, Average spend and CLVAbstract
Object of analysis: Is the Net Promoter Score, an indicator used to assess customer satisfaction, also used as a performance indicator for its easy implementation, analysis and communication. Proposed by Frederich Reichheld (2003), this score works as a measure The objectives of this study were to identify whether this satisfaction score can influence customer consumption, investigate whether other sales channels end up being driven by this same factor, as well as whether there is variation in the average spend and CLV (Customer Lifetime Value) of customers according to NPS.
Methodology used: Identified the relationship between the NPS score and customer loyalty, characterized by frequency of purchases, purchases in other company channels, average spending between promoter, neutral and detractor customers and also the value of CLV per customer, in a retail company in Brazil. The company studied has national coverage, is present in 22 Brazilian states with approximately 1,100 physical stores and strong participation in the e-commerce market. The company provided the customer base that responded to the NPS survey in 2019 and, based on queries from the company's own database, the purchasing behavior of these customers in the year 2020 was raised.
The tests: Were carried out to identify if there was a difference in the NPS scores between customers of the sales channels (physical stores and e-commerce) and also according to the gender of the customers, as well as to identify if promoting customers had a higher purchase frequency, higher spending medium, higher CLV and if they tried another sales channel, when compared to neutral customers and promoters. In general, it is possible to say that strong evidence was identified that customer satisfaction (measured by NPS) directly influences the frequency of purchases, average spending, CLV and the experimentation of other consumption channels for customers of physical stores. However, evidence has shown that for e-commerce customers, this difference between the same variables is non-existent between promoter, neutral and detractor customers.
Downloads
References
BASAK, S. et al. A game theoretic analysis of multichannel retail in the context of “showrooming”. Decision Support Systems, [s.l.], v. 103, p.34-45, nov. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.09.002
BERMAN, B.; THELEN, S. A guide to developing and managing a well-integrated multi- channel retail strategy, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol.32, n.3, 2004, p.147-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550410524939
BOROWSKI, C. 5 ferramentas indispensáveis para melhorar a experiência do cliente, 2016.
BRYNJOLFSSON, E.; HU, Y. J.; RAHMAN, M. S. Competing in the Age of Omnichannel Retailing: As technology blurs the distinctions between physical and online retailing, retailers and their supply-chain partners will need to rethink their competitive strategies. Mit Sloan Management Review, Cambridge, Massachusetts, v. 54, p.1-7, maio 2013. Trimestral.
CHARITOU, C. D; MARKEDIS, C. C. Responses to Disruptive Strategic Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter, p. 55-63, 2003.
CRITTENDEN, V. L.; PETERSON, R. A.; ALBAUM, G. Technology and Business-to- Consumer Selling: Contemplating Research and Practice. Journal Of Personal Selling & Sales Management, [s.l.], v. 30, n. 2, p.103-109, mar. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134300201
DELOITTE (Org.). The New Digital Divide: Retailers, shoppers, and the digital influence factor. 2014. Disponível em:
<https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/consumer-business/us-rd- thenewdigitaldivide-041814.pdf>. Acesso em: 21 julho 2021.
DICK, A.; BASU, K. (1994) Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v.22, n.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222001
DIXON, M., FREEMAN, K., TOMAN, N. (2010). Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, Boston, EUA, v. 88, n. 7, p. 116, ago.2010.
EAST, R., ROMANIUK, J., LOMAX, W. (2011). The NPS and the ACSI A critique and an alternative metric . International Journal of Market Research, Australia, v.53, n.3, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-53-3-327-346
FÁVERO, Luiz Paulo Lopes; BELFIORE, Patrícia Prado. Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com excel, SPSS e stata. [S.l: s.n.], 2017.
FISHER, N. I.; KORDUPLESKI, R. E. Good and bad market research: a critical review of Net Promoter Score. Applied Stochastic Models in Business & Industry, v. 35, n. 1, p. 138-151, 2019. DOI 10.1002/asmb.2417, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2417
KEININGHAM, TL, COOIL, B., ANDREASSEN, TW, & AKSOY, L. (2007) .Um exame longitudinal do promotor líquido e crescimento da receita. Journal of Marketing
KROL, M. W., DE BOER, D., DELNOIJ, D. M., et al. (2015). The Net Promoter Score – an asset to patient experience surveys?. Health Expectations, Nova Jersey, EUA, v. 18, n. 6, p. 3099-3109, dez.2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12297
KUMAR, V., POZZA, ID, & GANESH, J. (2013) Revisitando a relação satisfação-lealdade: generalizações empíricas e orientações para pesquisas futuras. Journal of Retailing
KUMAR, V.; AMAND, Ankit; SONG, Hyunseok. Future of Retailer Profitability: An Organizing Framework. Journal Of Retailing, [s.l.], v. 93, n. 1, p.96-119, mar. 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.11.003
LIN, F., WEI, W. A Combined Method of r-NPS and t-NPS Evaluations for Identification of Negative Triggers of Detractors’ Experience. sustainability, China, fev.2020.
MITTAL, B. (2016). Retrospective: why do customers switch? The dynamics of satisfaction versus loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, Kentucky, Estados Unidos, v. 30, n. 6, p. 569-575, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-07-2016-0277
OLIVER, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. NY: McGraw Hill, 1997.
PFEIFER, P. E.; HASKINS, M. E.; CONROY, R. M. (2004). Customer lifetime value, customer profitability, and the treatment of acquisition spending. Journal of Managerial Issues, v. 26, 2004.
PINGITORE, G., MORGAN, N.A., REGO, L.L, GIGLIOTTI, A., Meyers, J. The single-question trap. Marketing Research, Westlake Village, CA. , v. 19, n. 2, p. 8-13, jun.2007, 2007.
POZZA, I. Multichannel management gets “social”. European Journal Of Marketing, [s.l.], v. 48, n. 7/8, p.1274-1295, 8 jul. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2012-0598
REICHHELD, FF. O único número que você precisa para crescer. Harvard Business Review, 2003.
REICHHELD, F., MARKEY, R. The Ultimate Question 2.0: How Net Promoter Companies prosperam em um mundo orientado para o cliente, Harvard Business Press, 2011
SOUZA, M. G. de; SERRENTINO, A. Multivarejo na Próxima Economia. São Paulo: Pearson Education, 2002.
WALPOLE, R. E., MYERS, R.H., MYERS, S. L., YE, K. Probabilidade e Estatística para engenharia e ciências. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
ZAKI, M; KANDEIL, D; NEELY, A; MCCOLL-KENNEDY, R. J. (2016). The Fallacy of the Net Promoter Score: Customer Loyalty Predictive Model. Cambridge, Inglaterra. Disponível em: https://cambridgeservicealliance.eng.cam.ac.uk/resources/Downloads/Monthly%20Papers/2016OctoberPaper_Fa llacyoftheNetPromoterScore.pdf. Acesso em: 30 set. 2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Valéria Luisa Abreu de Araujo, Maurício Gerbaudo Morgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
