Authorship and memetization: a reflection on paratextualization of media products
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53946/rmrreview.v4i1.37Keywords:
Memes, Authorship, ParatextAbstract
Objective: This work sought to reflect on the production of memes from the appropriation of pop culture objects, as a form of text authoring, which results in the paratextualization of these objects. Pop culture, although responsible for large market numbers, also implies cultural aspects, innovation and re-appropriation of its objects. This re-appropriation happens when we consider that the objects of the media industry are texts, because for the possibility of their consumption to exist, a certain degree of interpretation and involvement is required from the consumer. As texts, these objects are subject to paratexts, which are contents created based on a main object. In addition to this, the concept of authorship supports the statement that the creator of a text is not the best explainer and the only holder of its meanings, as the text carries within itself a limit of interpretive possibilities about it, which causes in the reader, receiver or consumer, the author-function, which positions them as subjects of the text in question. It is at the heart of active and critical participation that the prosuming subject takes an ideological stance and reaffirms his authorship, unveiling as continuous meaning relations in his production - the meme.
Originality: From the understanding of the capacity of the text of memes and paratext by Gray et al., (2007), we rely on Foucault (2009) to highlight authorship as a functionality of its own discourse, the author-function presents itself in the possibility of reinterpretation of the reader, receiver or consumer, within the threshold of possibilities of the text itself.
Main results: As research findings, we understand that the process of creating memes inspired by the pop culture objects represent a materialization of the authorial process of the appropriate text, thus resulting in the paratextualization performed by prosumers.
Theoretical Contributions: The work theoretically contributes to studies on memetization, presenting its condition of paratext from Gray (2010), also dialoguing with concepts such as Foucault's author-function (2009), which allows us to affirm that memes are species of prosumed paratexts. from an author-function, which allows other actors to be authors of a text.
Downloads
References
Barker, C. (2012). Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. L.:Sage.
Barthes, R. (2004). A morte do autor. O rumor da língua, v. 2, p. 57-64.
Bennett, T. & Woollacott, J. (1987). Bond and beyond: The political career of a popular hero. New York: Methuen. p. 315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18610-5
Canclini, N, G. (2001). Consumidores e Cidadãos. 5ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.
Cavalcante, M. M. & Oliveira, R. L. (2019). O recurso aos memes em diferentes padrões de gêneros à luz da Linguística Textual. Revista Desenredo, 15(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5335/rdes.v15i1.8931
Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y. & Binay, I. (2019). Cultural globalization from the periphery: Translation practices of English-speaking K-pop fans. Journal of Consumer Culture. first publised online, p. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540519846215
Dawkins, R. (1976). O gene egoísta. Tradução de Rejane Rubino. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Derrida, J. (1973). O fim do livro e o começo da escritura. Gramatologia. Trad. Miriam Schnaiderman e Renato Janini Ribeiro. São Paulo: Perspectiva, p. 7-32.
Duffett, M. (2013). Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture. New York: Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501388354
Fathallah, J. (2016). Statements and silence: fanfic paratexts for ASOIAF/Game of Thrones. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, p. 75-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2015.1099150
Ferreira, E. (2016). Videogames, paratextos e narrativas (trans) midiáticas. Lumina, p. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34019/1981-4070.2016.v10.21236
Foucault, M. (2009). O que é um autor? In: Foucault, M. Ditos e escritos. Forense Universitária, São Paulo, v.3. 2.ed:, p.264-298.
Genette, G. (1997). Paratexts: thresholds of interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Genette, G. & Maclean, M. (1991). Introduction to the Paratext. New literary history, Baltimore, v. 22, n. 2, p. 261-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/469037
Gray, J. (2010). Show sold separately: promos, spoilers and other media paratexts. New York: New York University Press.
Gray, J., Sandvoss, C. & Harrington, C. L. (2007). Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press.
Hackley, C., & Hackley, A. R. (2018). Advertising at the threshold. Marketing Theory, 19(2), 195-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118787581
Halliday, M. A. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English: Longman.
Herrmann, L. A. (2012). Convergência midiática e as mudanças comportamentais no consumo do mercado de nicho: Netflix e a “desmaterialização” dos produtos. Animus. Revista Interamericana de Comunicação Midiática, Santa Maria, v. 11, n. 22, p.222-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/217549777080
Hills, M. (2002). Fan cultures Routledge. London and New York, p. 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361337
Jenkins, H. (2013). Cultura da convergência. 1. ed. São Paulo: Aleph. 432 p.
Lévy, P. (2010). Cibercultura. Editora 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/chev.034.0161
Lévy, P. (2003). O Que é o Virtual? 2. ed., São Paulo: editora 34, 2011.160p.
Martino, L. M. S. (2014). Teoria das mídias digitais: linguagens, ambientes e redes. Editora Vozes Limitada.
Mittell, J. (2004). Genre and television: From cop shows to cartoons in American culture. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203642139
Moreira, J. de O; Guerra, A. M. C.; Vidigal, M. F.; Silva, A. C. D. & Gois e Lima, R. (2019). A construção da expressão ‘autoria’ no ato infracional: entre discursividade e estigma. Psicologia em Estudo, v. 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v24i0.40169
Navarrete, M. J. (2020). Epistemología de las políticas de ciencia y tecnología en América Latina. Cinta de moebio, n. 67, p. 14-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2020000100014
Oliveira, D.; Gonçalves, M. & Sousa, B. (2020). A Gestão de Clientes e Lealdade com Recurso ao Marketing Experiencial: Uma Perspetiva Teórica. European Journal of Applied Business Management, v. 6, n. 1.
O'reilly, D. (2005). Cultural brands/branding cultures. Journal of Marketing Management, v. 21, n. 5-6, p. 573-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257054307336
Orlandi, E. P. (1995). Texto e discurso. Organon, v. 9, n. 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-8915.29365
Paulon, A.; Nascimento, J. V. & Laruccia, M. M. (2007). Análise do discurso: fundamentos teórico-metodológicos. Diálogos Interdisciplinares, 3(1), 25-45, 2014.
Recuero, R. C. (2007). Memes em weblogs: proposta de uma taxonomia. Conexões nas Redes Midiáticas. Revista FAMECOS, Porto Alegre, n. 32, p. 23-31, abr. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2007.32.3411
Ruiz D. C. A.; Kjellberg, H. (2020). Feral segmentation: How cultural intermediaries perform market segmentation in the wild. Marketing Theory, p. 1-29.
Sandvoss, C. (2005). One-dimensional Fan: Toward an Aesthetic of Fan Texts. American Behavioral Scientist, v. 49(3), p. 822-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204273170
Silva, A. A. (2016). Memes virtuais: Gênero do discurso, dialogismo, polifonia e heterogeneidade enunciativa. Travessias, 10(3), 341-361.
Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media?. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219461
Soares, T. (2014). Abordagens teóricas para estudos sobre cultura pop. Logos, v. 2, n. 24, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12957/logos.2014.14155
Souza-Leão, A. L. M.; Moura. B. M.; Henrique, V. M. R; Nunes. W. K. S. & Santana, I. R C. (2020). From play to political action: Prosumerism on fanvideo meme production. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, v. 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2020190121
Toffler, A. (1980). A terceira onda. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record. 491
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marilia Batista, André de Souza-Leão, Taynãh Andrade, Bianca Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html